Skip to main content

Malfeasance - Democrats on Social Media


 

Malfeasance - Democrats on Social Media

Don't you just love witnessing the Democrats constantly bashing Trump on social media? It's starting to feel like déjà vu all over again. I mean, aren't they tired of playing the same old tune? It's like they're stuck in a loop, endlessly scrolling through their timelines, just to let out a virtual sigh of disdain at every Trump-related post. Come on, folks, there are cat videos out there that deserve more attention!

But hey, I get it. Trump's tweets were like a never-ending reality show, a rollercoaster of chaos and confusion. It's hard not to poke fun at the guy, but c'mon every once in a while, you could save some outrage for crazy Uncle Joe.   Seriously, President Biden's recent comments about cannibals in New Guinea eating his uncle rank right at the top of the dumbest things ever uttered by a president.


Am I the only one that sees the irony here? While Democrats are busy condemning Trump's social media antics, they're not exactly setting a shining example themselves.   It's like a digital boxing match, with insults flying faster than you can say "unfollow." Maybe they should take a leaf out of Michelle Obama's book and remember, "When they go low, we go high." Or at least aim for a solid middle ground, you know, somewhere between Twitter feuds and Zen meditation.  The same sentiment applies to my MAGA friends who post things that are just as insulting and ridiculous.


In the end, maybe it's time for everyone to take a social media detox. Let's put down the smartphones, step away from the keyboard, and maybe, just maybe, engage in some actual face-to-face conversation. Who knows, we might even find common ground, like our shared love for dad jokes or disdain for being stuck in traffic.

If you have a dissenting opinion, then you might be suffering from DPMS, also known as Democrat Party Mascot Syndrome.  This condition makes you believe you're mentally and morally superior to others online.  This often leads to blaming Trump for everything, defending Biden at any cost and generally sounding and acting like a jackass, i.e. a donkey.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Saturday Cartoon 3-16-24

 
Read more

It's pronounced Or-ree!!!

  This first edition offers some insights into this weekly article and provides a brief history of Horry County.  Our readers can expect an array of subjects, topics, and stories, both current and past, that have opinion, fact, and some stories passed down over time with no collaboration aka Horry County lure.  No subject will be off-limits, and the goal is to be entertaining, informative, thought provoking, and simply a fun read.      Horry County: Pronounced (OR-ree), was occupied primarily by the Chicora Indian before English settlement in the early 1700’s. Not named Horry County until 1801, initial settlement was in 1732 by English settlers that made their way up the Waccamaw River from Georgetown to settle on a high bluff area overlooking the river where history claims the group of explores killed a bear eventually naming the area Kings Town in honor of the English King to later be named Conway.   Located in the easternmost region of the State, from settlement through the early 19
Read more

Rankin Out of Touch

  Luke Rankin is out of Touch with Voters Horry County Senator Luke Rankin put himself in a political box last week that he will find it difficult to get out of as reelection time rolls around. With reform of the process which elects judges in the state being a hot topic among the voters and other elected officials, Rankin chose last week to voice support, in an hour-long speech on the Senate floor last week, for the current process. As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Vice Chairman of the Judicial Merit Selection Commission, Rankin has a lot of say in who becomes judges in South Carolina. He probably can’t be blamed for wanting to keep that power in his hands. However, 695,791 voters in the recent South Carolina Presidential Primary election answered a question included on the ballot of whether the current process of electing judges in the state should be reformed. Over 91 percent, 634,345 to be exact, said YES. When 9 out of every 10 voters disagree with the position of
Read more