Skip to main content

Royal Prerogative and American Democracy


 


Royal Prerogative and American Democracy

By Dennis Mitchell


This week we celebrate the 4th of July and its meaning as the day in 1776 on which the 13 colonies in North America declared their independence from Great Britain. It is the 248th anniversary of this bold action. It can also be celebrated as the day on which government of laws replaced government by the whims of a monarch was introduced to the western world.


It is ironic that it occurs just several days after the Supreme Court of the United States declared the American president, whoever it may be, is immune from prosecution for criminal acts within the scope of the president’s official duties. The Court did not specify what official duties it was referring to, leaving that decision to a lower court over which it may rule in the future.


In doing so, it can be argued that the Supreme Court reintroduced the concept of royal prerogative into the American system of government. Royal prerogative is defined as a body of authority, privilege and immunity belonging to the sovereign. It was the unchecked actions of the British sovereign, King George III, toward the American colonies which led the colonies to declare independence in the first place. Maybe the six justices of the Supreme Court who supported this decision forgot, or never knew, this fact.


When the Constitution was written, the framers provided for removal from office of the president for “high crimes and misdemeanors.” In the course of history since, it has been decided that a president must first be removed from office before they can be charged and stand trial for these high crimes and misdemeanors. Isn’t it just as logical that the framers believed a president who would order the assassination of a political rival or order a military coup to remain in office after losing an election (both crimes which could be argued lie within the scope of the president’s official powers) would be arrested and tried for these crimes with impeachment following along?


The framers were accomplished, knowledgeable men who were putting together the first government based on the rather recent (at the time) concepts of liberal democracy and government by the people through elections, rather than by a monarch, which was the standard of the times. It seems absurd to think that they anticipated the reintroduction of royal prerogative would result from this experiment. But, here it is today.

 

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Saturday Cartoon 3-16-24

 
Read more

It's pronounced Or-ree!!!

  This first edition offers some insights into this weekly article and provides a brief history of Horry County.  Our readers can expect an array of subjects, topics, and stories, both current and past, that have opinion, fact, and some stories passed down over time with no collaboration aka Horry County lure.  No subject will be off-limits, and the goal is to be entertaining, informative, thought provoking, and simply a fun read.      Horry County: Pronounced (OR-ree), was occupied primarily by the Chicora Indian before English settlement in the early 1700’s. Not named Horry County until 1801, initial settlement was in 1732 by English settlers that made their way up the Waccamaw River from Georgetown to settle on a high bluff area overlooking the river where history claims the group of explores killed a bear eventually naming the area Kings Town in honor of the English King to later be named Conway.   Located in the easternmost region of the State, from settlement through the early 19
Read more

Rankin Out of Touch

  Luke Rankin is out of Touch with Voters Horry County Senator Luke Rankin put himself in a political box last week that he will find it difficult to get out of as reelection time rolls around. With reform of the process which elects judges in the state being a hot topic among the voters and other elected officials, Rankin chose last week to voice support, in an hour-long speech on the Senate floor last week, for the current process. As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Vice Chairman of the Judicial Merit Selection Commission, Rankin has a lot of say in who becomes judges in South Carolina. He probably can’t be blamed for wanting to keep that power in his hands. However, 695,791 voters in the recent South Carolina Presidential Primary election answered a question included on the ballot of whether the current process of electing judges in the state should be reformed. Over 91 percent, 634,345 to be exact, said YES. When 9 out of every 10 voters disagree with the position of
Read more